To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, Full-Time Four-Wheel Drive is standard on the Wrangler. But it costs extra on the CR-V.
Both the Wrangler and the CR-V have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, rearview cameras, available crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Jeep Wrangler is safer than the Honda CR-V:
|
|
Wrangler |
CR-V |
|
|
Passenger |
|
| STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
| HIC |
281 |
357 |
| Neck Injury Risk |
38% |
54% |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH moderate front offset crash tests on new cars. In this updated test, results indicate that the Wrangler is much safer than the CR-V:
|
|
Wrangler |
CR-V |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
POOR |
| Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Chest Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Thigh/hip Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Leg/foot Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Rear Passenger Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Thigh Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Restraints |
GOOD |
POOR |
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Jeep Wrangler 4-door is safer than the CR-V:
|
|
Wrangler |
CR-V |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Head Injury Criterion |
33 |
138 |
| Neck Tension |
134 lbs. |
178 lbs. |
| Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Shoulder Deflection |
.59 in |
.91 in |
| Shoulder Force |
156 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
| Torso Max Deflection |
.83 in |
1.3 in |
| Torso Deflection Rate |
6 MPH |
7 MPH |
| Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Pelvis Force |
558 lbs. |
1093 lbs. |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Shoulder Deflection |
.2 in |
.94 in |
| Shoulder Force |
22 lbs. |
223 lbs. |
| Torso Max Deflection |
.91 in |
1.06 in |
| Torso Deflection Rate |
6 MPH |
7 MPH |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |

